In most issues of The Morgan Report I answer
questions from our subscribers, this week I looked
back at some past issues and picked out a few that
might be of interest to this readership as well.
Letter #1
Dear David,
Thank you very much for your hard work and excellent
research. Your level approach to the metals has long
been a beacon to follow. Thank you.
I am writing to inquire about your opinion of the
coming need for companies to follow the FASB-157
accounting rules. There has been some speculation on
Web forums (such as PrudentBear Chat) that there
could be some fall out in the coming months as
companies which have been calling derivatives and
other "mark to model" assets cash and short-term
cash on their balance sheets. What level of risk is
there that the junior mining companies might be
bitten by this bug-bear? I would imagine that any
producing mines could simply point to their ounces
in production as an offset to any suddenly weakened
assets that come to light via FASB-157, but wonder
what impact this might have on the junior sector as
a whole. Kind regards, Chris
Comment:
Thank you for the kind words. A lot of what makes my
work so enjoyable is hearing from subscribers such
as you. Soon after the initial fallout of the
derivatives mess last fall, which several prominent
resource sector writers such as Jim Sinclair and
Greg McCoach (and I) have been railing against for
some time, a number of the mining companies we
follow were quick to assure shareholders that they
did not have exposure to these financial time bombs.
You are correct to wonder if, as the new accounting
rules take effect, this might be a cause for
concern. My studied response is as follows: First, I
don’t believe that our sector has seen the level of
participation in these investment vehicles that has
been taking place in, say, financial houses, pension
plans, and banks. Second, there is a simple way to
find out... go to their Web site and see if they
mention their involvement, or lack thereof, in these
derivatives. If they don’t have a statement, call
the IR of the company in question and ask them
point-blank. I think you will find them to be
upfront about it. (And if they aren't, that tells
you something too, doesn't it?)
Actually I am much less worried that the sector will
be tarred with this brush than I am about the
ability of many of these “blue sky” explorers to
raise the cash they need to keep drilling. Money is
going to be harder to come by, it will cost more to
get it, and shareholders will expect to see tangible
results for the expenditures. If a company is not
looking to either start production by themselves, JV
with a major on a project, or at least have some
very good looking property to prove up over the next
12-18 months, they could be in real trouble.
Letter #2
Hi Dave,
A lot of talk around at the moment about a shortage
in physical silver. If this is the case, wouldn’t
there be a rush to take delivery of physical silver
from the exchange to arbitrage the difference? Could
the short supply just be a fabrication holdup?
– Cheers—name withheld upon request
Comment:
I want to be as specific as possible here. I spoke
with the main producer of the blanks for the U.S.
government mint making the silver eagles. In the
past,
250,000 blanks per week was sufficient for silver
products. At this time the level of production has
been increased to 400,000 per week, and the mint is
behind on orders. One thing we can state for a fact,
the fabrication is not keeping up with demand!
Secondly, very few 100-oz. bars have been made since
the 1970s to early 1980s. Certainly some are being
fabricated, but nothing like what was done in the
previous bull market. Thus, until recently, the
investor 100-oz. bars just kept changing hands. Now,
however, these bars are in strong hands and new
demand cannot be met. Markets strive for balance,
and when a profit opportunity exists, markets
normally find a way to exploit it. It make take some
more time but if the current demand holds, look for
new 100-oz. bars to be fabricated by someone to meet
demand.
Letter #3
Dear Mr. Morgan, I have two points that I would be
grateful for you to address, as they seem relevant
to any silver investor at the moment: silver under
performing gold (ratio back to 100?).
The last couple of months have seen a dramatic drop
for silver much more than gold with the ration going
from 50 to over 70. I believe this is a widely
acknowledged fact that silver under performs gold in
times of recession and some commentators (Bob Hoye
for example) have been calling for a return to the
silver-gold ratio to 100. The outlook for
commodities is rather bleak at the moment and this
seems to affect silver also. What is your view on
the ratio returning to 100?
Comment:
My view is silver is more volatile than gold and I
doubt we will see the 80 to 1 ratio again, which is
the ratio where the silver bull market began in
2003. If the ratio got back to 80 to 1 or higher
then I would get concerned. Hoye was interviewed by
me and he does not study the silver market the way I
do. Historically he is correct for the most part,
but history does not repeat exactly. Silver has
every attribute that gold has, plus it is also
required by Industry. When the U.S. dollar panic
really gets going, people in Latin America and Asia
will buy silver because they know it protects and
preserves wealth. These buyers never have heard of
and never will hear or care about Bob Hoye or David
Morgan for that matter.
Further, after my interview with Hoye and his being
so negative toward silver, I asked him if he knew
that Mexico had introduced a bill to permit silver
coinage to come back into the monetary system
alongside the peso. Hoye knew nothing about it. My
point is, question your basic premise and even
question the “authorities” on any subject, yours
truly included. If you know why you own silver in
the first place, then either hold or add to your
holdings.
It is an honor to be.
Sincerely,
David Morgan
Mr. Morgan has followed the silver market for more
than thirty years. He wrote the book,
Get the Skinny on Silver Investing. Much of his
Web site,
Silver-Investor.com,
is devoted to education about the precious metals,
it is both a free site and does have a members only
section. To receive full access to
The Morgan Report click the hyperlink.
Subscribe
To The Silver Investor Today
Disclaimer: Information contained herein has been
obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but
there is no guarantee as to completeness or
accuracy. Because individual investment objectives
vary, this Summary should not be construed as advice
to meet the particular needs of the reader. Any
opinions expressed herein are statements of our
judgment as of this date and are subject to change
without notice. Any action taken as a result of
reading this independent market research is solely
the responsibility of the reader. Stone Investment
Group is not and does not profess to be a
professional investment advisor, and strongly
encourages all readers to consult with their own
personal financial advisors, attorneys, and
accountants before making any investment decision.
Stone Investment Group and/or independent
consultants or members of their families may have a
position in the securities mentioned. Investing and
speculation are inherently risky and should not be
undertaken without professional advice. By your act
of reading this independent market research letter,
you fully and explicitly agree that Stone Investment
Group will not be held liable or responsible for any
decisions you make regarding any information
discussed herein.